H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Michael Llodra vs Peter Wessels H2H: 1-0
Michael Llodra holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Wessels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2005 Rotterdam third round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Peter Wessels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Llodra | Peter Wessels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |