H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Llodra vs Steve Darcis H2H: 2-1
Michael Llodra holds a 2–1 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-4 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Michael Llodra | 6-4 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2012 | Basel | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 6-2 6-1 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Steve Darcis | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2008* | Halle | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Michael Llodra | 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Llodra | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |