H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Michael Russell vs Mitchell J. Polnet

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Michael Russell vs Mitchell J. Polnet.

USA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Russell #93 6-1 6-2 Mitchell J. Polnet #1836 Match data Aug 21, 2011 Q1 Q Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Russell #1,124 #60 693 1,809 77 150 33.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mitchell J. Polnet #1,665 #1,514 1 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Michael Russell Mitchell J. Polnet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1998 0–2 0.0% #288 1,473 0 0
2000 1–6 14.3% #155 1,507 0 0
2001 8–17 32.0% #87 1,573 0 0
2002 5–15 25.0% #157 1,511 0 0
2003 1–1 50.0% #502 1,530 0 0
2006 0–2 0.0% #144 1,563 0 0
2007 10–19 34.5% #82 1,617 0 0
2008 3–5 37.5% #242 1,610 0 0
2009 2–4 33.3% #83 1,636 0 0
2010 11–23 32.4% #99 1,628 0 0
2011 12–18 40.0% #99 1,748 0 0
2012 11–11 50.0% #87 1,749 0 0
2013 7–15 31.8% #92 1,638 0 0
2014 6–11 35.3% #158 1,582 0 0
2015 0–1 0.0% #557 1,611 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Michael Russell Mitchell J. Polnet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1998 1473 105.5 -1.20 -1.55 0.950 48.8% 16.7% -1.50 +0.13 2011 1494 101.0
2000 1507 103.7 -2.23 -1.34 0.871 47.5% -15 33.3% -1.14 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) +0.65
2001 1573 122.4 -1.89 +0.09 0.908 47.9% -32 +20 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 3–6 (33%) -0.46
2002 1512 111.5 -4.18 -0.10 0.860 47.1% +27 -42 +56 30.6% -1.31 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 0.00
2003 1530 108.4 0.00 +2.07 0.988 49.6% 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 -0.19
2004 1548 105.6
2006 1563 110.1 -2.13 -0.63 0.839 46.4% 25.0% -1.00 0–1 -0.01
2007 1617 131.4 -2.18 -0.79 0.851 47.4% +33 -140 -127 37.5% -0.66 3–3 (50%) 5–6 (45%) -1.61
2008 1610 122.6 -0.43 +2.15 1.039 50.9% +29 40.9% -0.14 1–2 (33%) +0.39
2009 1636 122.0 -2.07 +1.17 0.956 49.0% +31 50.0% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) -0.14
2010 1629 131.7 -3.68 -0.27 0.871 47.2% +47 -171 -147 37.2% -0.87 3–7 (30%) 4–8 (33%) -0.38
2011 1748 137.8 -1.30 -0.31 0.912 48.4% +61 -283 -272 38.0% -0.62 3–2 (60%) 4–10 (29%) -0.97
2012 1750 129.2 -1.23 -0.23 0.964 49.4% -28 -166 -145 48.3% -0.12 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) -0.09
2013 1639 129.7 -3.05 -0.32 0.880 47.7% +17 -109 +24 37.5% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) +0.09
2014 1582 133.8 -3.02 -0.10 0.891 47.9% +93 -76 41.3% -0.72 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) +0.34
2015 1611 117.2 +1.80 +0.23 0.798 45.5% 25.0% -2.50 -0.14
Career 1810 133.9 -2.37 -0.17 0.897 48.0% +30 -88 -82 38.4% -0.75 23–41 (36%) 35–48 (42%) 91.4 -1.05 Career 1500 100.5

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.