H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Michael Russell vs Prakash Amritraj H2H: 1-0
Michael Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Prakash Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Russell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Russell won the 2010 Chennai third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2010* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Russell | 6-3 6-1 | Prakash Amritraj | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2007 | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Michael Russell | 6-4 6-2 | Prakash Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,810 | 77 | 149 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prakash Amritraj | #1,181 | #154 | 475 | 1,584 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Russell | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #714 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #280 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #340 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #393 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #210 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |