Michael Russell
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | 5 | 1 | 6 | Mar 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Sam Querrey | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 30, 2014 | H2H |
| John Isner | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 20, 2014 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 15, 2014 | H2H |
| Dmitry Tursunov | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 15, 2014 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Michael Russell vs Thiago Alves
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Michael Russell vs Thiago Alves.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Russell | 6-2 6-3 | Thiago Alves | Match data | Mar 25, 2009 | Q1 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,809 | 77 | 150 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiago Alves | #885 | #88 | 755 | 1,632 | 7 | 23 | 23.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Russell | Thiago Alves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #383 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #150 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Michael Russell | Thiago Alves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2006 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2003 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2010 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 55 | 92 | 147 | 37.4% | 12 | 35 | 47 | 25.5% | 10 | 23 | 33 | 30.3% | — | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 221/227 of Michael Russell's and 28/30 of Thiago Alves's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Michael Russell | Thiago Alves | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 61.0% | 61.1% | 43.5% | 40.0% | 20.0% | 54.2% | 31.7% |
| 20 | 1998 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 62.7% | 65.8% | 51.1% | 37.5% | 30.0% | 60.3% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 6/7 | 3.8 | 6.5 | 61.4% | 65.1% | 45.0% | 50.8% | 61.1% | 57.3% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 23/25 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 68.9% | 63.2% | 46.6% | 46.6% | 39.5% | 57.9% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 18/20 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 69.4% | 60.3% | 48.8% | 54.0% | 33.9% | 56.8% | 37.1% | 2006 | 6/6 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 67.2% | 65.8% | 58.3% | 40.3% | 50.7% | 62.9% | 37.1% |
| 25 | 2003 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 67.5% | 66.0% | 49.4% | 73.3% | 35.4% | 60.5% | 39.0% | 2007 | 5/7 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 70.2% | 63.8% | 43.8% | 39.0% | 22.3% | 57.6% | 31.0% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 57.7% | 64.4% | 47.2% | 65.2% | 38.1% | 57.5% | 35.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 59.6% | 63.6% | 49.6% | 47.5% | 44.0% | 57.7% | 29.4% |
| 28 | 2006 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 66.0% | 58.1% | 43.8% | 46.9% | 39.6% | 53.1% | 39.4% | 2010 | 6/6 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 66.2% | 61.6% | 41.5% | 51.3% | 32.3% | 55.0% | 31.3% |
| 29 | 2007 | 29/29 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 68.1% | 65.3% | 47.3% | 53.1% | 44.2% | 59.4% | 34.6% | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 56.0% | 66.7% | 39.4% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 54.7% | 24.5% |
| 30 | 2008 | 8/8 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 66.4% | 64.4% | 51.9% | 54.5% | 46.5% | 60.3% | 41.2% | 2012 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 66.1% | 35.9% | 40.0% | 53.3% | 100.0% | 37.3% | 39.0% |
| 31 | 2009 | 6/6 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 69.8% | 63.9% | 51.0% | 57.2% | 33.1% | 59.6% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 34/34 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 65.1% | 63.6% | 49.0% | 48.2% | 39.5% | 58.7% | 35.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 30/30 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 63.3% | 70.0% | 47.0% | 48.6% | 46.5% | 61.2% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 22/22 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 63.7% | 67.2% | 50.5% | 46.4% | 51.2% | 61.0% | 37.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 22/22 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 64.2% | 65.6% | 47.0% | 47.6% | 40.4% | 58.9% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 17/17 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 62.5% | 64.5% | 48.4% | 51.8% | 39.0% | 58.9% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 62.7% | 54.2% | 42.1% | 60.9% | 23.5% | 49.7% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 221/227 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 65.7% | 65.0% | 48.1% | 50.0% | 42.4% | 59.1% | 36.7% | — | 28/30 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 64.6% | 62.8% | 47.6% | 47.2% | 41.8% | 57.3% | 32.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Michael Russell | Thiago Alves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1495 | 100.5 | +3.41 | +0.79 | 0.694 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.15 |
| 20 | 1998 | 1473 | 105.5 | -1.20 | -1.55 | 0.950 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2002 | 1482 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1507 | 103.7 | -2.23 | -1.34 | 0.871 | 47.5% | — | -15 | — | 33.3% | -1.14 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1573 | 122.4 | -1.89 | +0.09 | 0.908 | 47.9% | -32 | +20 | — | 36.5% | -0.84 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.46 | 2005 | 1491 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 1512 | 111.5 | -4.18 | -0.10 | 0.860 | 47.1% | +27 | -42 | +56 | 30.6% | -1.31 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | 0.00 | 2006 | 1558 | 104.0 | -1.34 | -0.82 | 1.002 | 49.6% | +20 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.06 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.46 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1530 | 108.4 | 0.00 | +2.07 | 0.988 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 60.0% | -0.20 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | 2007 | 1467 | 101.3 | -1.28 | -1.95 | 0.731 | 44.3% | — | +20 | — | 13.3% | -2.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1548 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1570 | 120.8 | +1.34 | +1.59 | 0.841 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.15 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1564 | 110.8 | -1.53 | -0.71 | 0.696 | 44.3% | — | — | — | 21.1% | -1.69 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.71 |
| 28 | 2006 | 1563 | 110.1 | -2.13 | -0.63 | 0.839 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | 2010 | 1556 | 115.1 | -2.85 | -2.10 | 0.696 | 43.5% | -11 | +10 | — | 25.0% | -1.56 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.16 |
| 29 | 2007 | 1617 | 131.4 | -2.18 | -0.79 | 0.851 | 47.4% | +33 | -140 | -127 | 37.5% | -0.66 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -1.61 | 2011 | 1520 | 101.2 | -0.74 | -0.52 | 0.541 | 42.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1610 | 122.6 | -0.43 | +2.15 | 1.039 | 50.9% | +29 | — | — | 40.9% | -0.14 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.39 | 2012 | 1511 | 95.4 | -2.05 | -1.23 | 0.622 | 38.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| 31 | 2009 | 1636 | 122.0 | -2.07 | +1.17 | 0.956 | 49.0% | +31 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.14 | 2013 | 1478 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1629 | 131.7 | -3.68 | -0.27 | 0.871 | 47.2% | +47 | -171 | -147 | 37.2% | -0.87 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 1748 | 137.8 | -1.30 | -0.31 | 0.912 | 48.4% | +61 | -283 | -272 | 38.0% | -0.62 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | -0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 1750 | 129.2 | -1.23 | -0.23 | 0.964 | 49.4% | -28 | -166 | -145 | 48.3% | -0.12 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 1639 | 129.7 | -3.05 | -0.32 | 0.880 | 47.7% | +17 | -109 | +24 | 37.5% | -0.88 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 1582 | 133.8 | -3.02 | -0.10 | 0.891 | 47.9% | +93 | -76 | — | 41.3% | -0.72 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 1611 | 117.2 | +1.80 | +0.23 | 0.798 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1810 | 133.9 | -2.37 | -0.17 | 0.897 | 48.0% | +30 | -88 | -82 | 38.4% | -0.75 | 23–41 (36%) | 35–48 (42%) | 91.4 | -1.05 | — | 1632 | 109.0 | -1.34 | -1.05 | 0.759 | 45.2% | +7 | +16 | — | 26.3% | -1.49 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.6 | -1.33 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Thiago Alves
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 26, 2010 | H2H |
| Evgeny Korolev | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 12, 2012 | H2H |
| Simon Greul | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 28, 2010 | H2H |
| Rainer Schuettler | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 13, 2010 | H2H |