H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 2-1
Michael Stich holds a 2–1 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on carpet, while Michael Stich leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1993 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1993* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Michael Stich | 6-2 6-3 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Michael Stich | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1992* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Amos Mansdorf | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |