H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 0-2
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Michael Stich in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1996 Rome Masters third round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1996* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Michael Stich | Match data |
| Jul 23, 1994* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-2 6-2 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |