H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michael Stich vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 3-1
Michael Stich holds a 3–1 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1994 Munich third round 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1994* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Michael Stich | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1994* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 6-2 6-1 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1993* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 7-5 6-3 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1990* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-4 6-4 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |