H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Stich vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 3-1

Michael Stich holds a 3–1 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1992 Roland Garros first round 7-5 3-6 6-7(4) 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Stich
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Michael Stich #5 7-5 3-6 6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 Jimmy Connors #38 Match data
Mar 5, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Stich #5 6-4 6-3 Jimmy Connors #38 Match data
Feb 14, 1992* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #46 5-7 7-6(5) 7-5 Michael Stich #3 Match data
Sep 27, 1990* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Stich #65 7-6 6-3 Jimmy Connors #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Stich #116 #2 3,445 2,119 350 162 68.4% 1 2 2 0 13 18
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Stich Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1989 11–12 47.8% #100 1,586 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1990 29–23 55.8% #42 1,781 0 1 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1991 68–23 74.7% #4 1,989 1 5 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1992 42–19 68.9% #15 2,016 1 7 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1993 67–19 77.9% #2 2,082 1 13 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1994 54–21 72.0% #9 1,925 1 16 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1995 39–18 68.4% #12 1,895 1 17 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1996 25–15 62.5% #16 1,828 1 18 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1997 15–12 55.6% #64 1,842 1 18 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 — — — — — — — 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109