H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 2-1
Michael Stich holds a 2–1 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 1–0 on carpet, while Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1991 Vienna third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1991* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 6-3 6-4 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Michael Stich | 6-4 6-4 2-0 (ret.) | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| May 4, 1989* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Leonardo Lavalle | 3-6 6-2 7-6 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |