H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Marcos Ondruska H2H: 0-1
Marcos Ondruska holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Stich in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcos Ondruska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Ondruska won the 1993 Miami Masters fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1993* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Marcos Ondruska | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Marcos Ondruska | #1,352 | #27 | 1,007 | 1,785 | 105 | 137 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Marcos Ondruska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #67 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #47 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1995 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #114 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #102 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1998 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |