H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Michael Stich and Martin Damm Sr are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 2–0 on carpet, while Michael Stich leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1996 Ostrava quarterfinal 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Damm Sr | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Michael Stich | Match data | Oct 19, 1996* | QF | Ostrava | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Michael Stich | 7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | May 31, 1995* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Martin Damm Sr | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Michael Stich | Match data | Oct 14, 1993* | R32 | Bolzano | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Michael Stich | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Oct 2, 1993* | SF | Swiss Indoors | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,120 | 351 | 163 | 68.3% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 18 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michael Stich | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,991 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #15 | 2,005 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,083 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,932 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,896 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,833 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,844 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Michael Stich | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 31 | 10 | 41 | 75.6% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1992 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1993 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 24 | 6 | 30 | 80.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1994 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1995 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1996 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1997 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 118 | 60 | 178 | 66.3% | 84 | 42 | 126 | 66.7% | 58 | 16 | 74 | 78.4% | 91 | 45 | 136 | 66.9% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Michael Stich | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1989 | 1586 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -34 | +24 | 51.7% | +0.15 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.0 | +0.27 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1990 | 1785 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -221 | -110 | 57.4% | +0.43 | 5–11 (31%) | 17–10 (63%) | 100.6 | -2.47 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1991 | 1991 | 162.6 | +7.11 | +1.14 | 1.226 | 53.3% | -46 | -130 | -46 | 69.4% | +1.15 | 12–7 (63%) | 28–17 (62%) | 110.5 | -3.59 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1992 | 2006 | 155.8 | +6.32 | +0.24 | 1.184 | 52.7% | -29 | -142 | +14 | 65.1% | +0.82 | 6–7 (46%) | 19–13 (59%) | 99.6 | -1.90 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1993 | 2084 | 165.9 | +5.83 | +1.02 | 1.168 | 52.6% | +6 | -105 | +36 | 68.4% | +0.97 | 23–10 (70%) | 37–17 (69%) | 111.3 | -2.80 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1994 | 1933 | 155.0 | +5.80 | +0.79 | 1.225 | 53.3% | +27 | +70 | +175 | 66.5% | +1.00 | 16–6 (73%) | 18–18 (50%) | 98.1 | +0.70 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1995 | 1897 | 154.8 | +4.74 | +2.25 | 1.210 | 53.3% | +35 | +61 | +83 | 65.5% | +0.98 | 10–6 (63%) | 13–14 (48%) | 100.1 | -0.41 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1996 | 1834 | 149.9 | +3.10 | +2.21 | 1.154 | 52.8% | +5 | +182 | +187 | 62.6% | +0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 15–7 (68%) | 97.2 | -1.26 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 1997 | 1844 | 128.8 | +1.60 | +0.14 | 1.038 | 50.8% | -74 | +115 | +189 | 56.0% | +0.08 | 5–4 (56%) | 8–7 (53%) | 96.8 | -0.51 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| Career | 2120 | 160.0 | +5.49 | +1.09 | 1.187 | 52.9% | -7 | -44 | +61 | 64.7% | +0.84 | 82–62 (57%) | 157–105 (60%) | 105.6 | -2.34 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 8 | 6 | 14 | Oct 30, 1996 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 7 | 6 | 13 | Apr 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 4 | 9 | 13 | Oct 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Jim Courier | 6 | 5 | 11 | Jun 25, 1997 | H2H |
| Alexander Volkov | 8 | 1 | 9 | Feb 29, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |