H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Martin Jaite H2H: 2-1
Michael Stich holds a 2–1 lead over Martin Jaite in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Martin Jaite leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1992 Australian Open third round 6-0 2-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Michael Stich | 6-0 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Michael Stich | 6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-7 6-4 6-7 6-4 6-3 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Martin Jaite | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 |