H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michael Stich vs Shuzo Matsuoka H2H: 3-0
Michael Stich holds a 3–0 lead over Shuzo Matsuoka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1996 Wimbledon second round 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Michael Stich | 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1992* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Stich | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(7) | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1989* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 6-0 6-1 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Shuzo Matsuoka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |