H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Thomas Muster H2H: 3-1
Michael Stich holds a 3–1 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1996 Roland Garros fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-1 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Michael Stich | 4-6 6-4 6-1 7-6(1) | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1994* | Vienna | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Michael Stich | 6-3 6-3 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| May 8, 1993* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Michael Stich | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-1 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1992* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Michael Stich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Thomas Muster | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 |