H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Todd Martin H2H: 2-1
Michael Stich holds a 2–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Michael Stich leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1996 Stuttgart Masters third round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1996* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Todd Martin | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Michael Stich | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1993* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1992* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Stich | 6-2 6-2 | Todd Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |