H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 3-0
Michael Stich holds a 3–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Stich leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Stich won the 1997 Rotterdam fourth round 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1997* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Michael Stich | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1991* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Michael Stich | 6-1 6-2 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| May 8, 1991* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Michael Stich | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |