H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Michael Tebbutt vs David Nainkin H2H: 1-0

Michael Tebbutt holds a 1–0 lead over David Nainkin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Tebbutt leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Tebbutt won the 1996 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Tebbutt
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
David Nainkin
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Tebbutt #102 6-4 6-2 David Nainkin #164 Match data Feb 1, 1996* R32 Shanghai Masters World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Tebbutt #1,411 #87 527 1,736 64 84 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
David Nainkin #910 #132 350 1,628 26 43 37.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Tebbutt David Nainkin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1992 1–1 50.0% #261 1,514 0 0
22 1993 3–5 37.5% #179 1,528 0 0 1993 4–5 44.4% #163 1,528 0 0
23 1994 9–11 45.0% #133 1,568 0 0 1994 3–10 23.1% #176 1,485 0 0
24 1995 18–21 46.2% #94 1,678 0 0 1995 4–5 44.4% #173 1,521 0 0
25 1996 13–16 44.8% #134 1,624 0 0 1996 5–10 33.3% #172 1,509 0 0
26 1997 6–11 35.3% #146 1,613 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #282 1,532 0 0
27 1998 12–15 44.4% #122 1,584 0 0 1998 7–9 43.8% #136 1,614 0 0
28 1999 2–3 40.0% #351 1,586 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #713 1,601 0 0
29 2000 0–1 0.0% #702 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–1 50.0% #415 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Tebbutt David Nainkin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1994 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1994 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1995 12 10 22 54.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1996 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 1998 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1999 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 49 90 45.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 4 11 15 26.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 16 29 45 35.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 130/147 of Michael Tebbutt's and 61/69 of David Nainkin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Tebbutt David Nainkin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 2/2 4.5 5.5 57.0% 64.9% 60.1% 20.8% 40.0% 63.0% 35.5%
22 1993 7/8 9.3 4.4 49.1% 78.1% 50.5% 44.0% 18.8% 63.4% 32.2% 1993 7/9 2.1 6.0 62.4% 64.1% 46.8% 48.0% 47.6% 57.7% 45.1%
23 1994 18/20 13.4 5.4 54.4% 80.8% 47.9% 60.9% 36.9% 65.7% 36.2% 1994 11/13 2.5 6.4 59.9% 62.1% 38.5% 45.5% 46.8% 52.7% 40.6%
24 1995 33/39 12.8 7.0 51.3% 79.2% 46.8% 62.7% 38.9% 62.7% 33.3% 1995 7/9 2.1 5.7 62.5% 65.3% 44.6% 66.2% 35.2% 57.7% 33.3%
25 1996 27/29 10.9 5.6 54.5% 76.6% 47.0% 55.5% 43.8% 63.0% 36.6% 1996 13/15 2.1 4.8 59.1% 59.8% 43.4% 51.6% 55.4% 53.1% 36.4%
26 1997 17/17 12.5 8.0 48.1% 81.8% 50.2% 58.5% 44.0% 65.5% 35.1% 1997 4/4 2.8 3.3 64.0% 63.6% 45.4% 55.7% 45.2% 56.8% 37.1%
27 1998 21/27 7.8 7.4 51.6% 73.9% 42.8% 57.2% 40.6% 59.1% 36.6% 1998 16/16 3.8 6.0 59.5% 66.9% 44.0% 50.8% 43.0% 57.8% 35.0%
28 1999 5/5 9.8 5.0 58.0% 73.3% 45.0% 42.6% 45.8% 61.7% 34.8% 1999 1/1 1.0 4.0 56.8% 66.7% 25.0% 14.3% 55.6% 48.6% 44.9%
30 2001 2/2 7.0 9.0 57.4% 75.0% 37.6% 35.9% 41.5% 59.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130/148 11.3 6.5 52.3% 78.0% 46.8% 57.3% 39.8% 62.9% 35.4% — 61/69 2.7 5.5 60.3% 63.7% 43.6% 50.2% 46.2% 55.8% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Tebbutt David Nainkin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1514 108.9 -1.23 +1.69 0.960 49.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.13
22 1993 1528 116.9 +1.36 -0.40 0.879 47.7% +17 — — 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.46 1993 1529 119.4 -1.75 +2.08 1.066 51.5% +41 — — 37.5% -0.17 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.33
23 1994 1569 126.2 +2.03 -1.09 1.056 51.0% -7 — +35 50.9% +0.23 2–6 (25%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.51 1994 1486 111.8 -5.58 +1.24 0.858 46.6% +9 — — 31.3% -1.44 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.29
24 1995 1678 130.4 +0.67 -3.08 0.895 48.5% +38 -149 -145 44.3% -0.35 11–5 (69%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.13 1995 1521 108.6 -2.01 -2.30 0.787 46.1% -2 — — 43.5% -0.61 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.52
25 1996 1624 132.5 +0.86 -1.09 0.990 50.3% +71 -81 — 47.5% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.08 1996 1509 108.0 -5.09 -0.17 0.775 44.7% +16 — +94 34.2% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.18
26 1997 1613 131.8 +2.38 -1.49 1.017 50.3% +42 — — 44.9% -0.04 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.37 1997 1532 105.1 -1.82 +1.24 0.858 47.5% — — — 44.4% -1.11 1–0 — — -0.05
27 1998 1585 113.1 -1.87 -1.62 0.894 48.4% +58 -47 -88 43.5% -0.33 5–6 (45%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.92 1998 1615 126.5 -3.09 -1.13 0.830 46.6% -1 — +18 44.2% -0.60 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.14
28 1999 1586 115.1 -1.44 -0.68 0.908 48.6% +45 — — 40.0% -0.53 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.12 1999 1601 104.4 +1.29 -0.16 0.875 46.9% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.06
29 2000 1550 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1550 102.5 -0.09 -1.50 1.151 52.5% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1737 132.1 +0.66 -1.69 0.954 49.5% +41 -100 -56 45.5% -0.18 27–36 (43%) 34–49 (41%) 93.3 +0.54 — 1628 121.5 -3.47 0.00 0.850 46.9% +12 — +60 38.4% -0.90 12–10 (55%) 9–8 (53%) 105.3 +3.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.