H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michael Tebbutt vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-1
Michael Tebbutt and Mark Knowles are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on carpet, while Michael Tebbutt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Knowles won the 1996 Shanghai semifinal 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1996* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Mark Knowles | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Michael Tebbutt | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1994* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Tebbutt | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Tebbutt | #1,411 | #87 | 527 | 1,735 | 64 | 84 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Tebbutt | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #179 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #146 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #122 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #351 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #702 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #415 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |