H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Michael Tebbutt vs Oscar Burrieza H2H: 0-1

Oscar Burrieza holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Tebbutt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Oscar Burrieza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Oscar Burrieza won the 1998 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Tebbutt
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Oscar Burrieza
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Oscar Burrieza 6-3 7-6(3) Michael Tebbutt #97 Match data Apr 9, 1998* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Tebbutt #1,411 #87 527 1,736 64 84 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oscar Burrieza — — — 1,500 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Tebbutt Oscar Burrieza
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1993 3–5 37.5% #179 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1994 9–11 45.0% #133 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1995 18–21 46.2% #94 1,678 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1996 13–16 44.8% #134 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1997 6–11 35.3% #146 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1998 12–15 44.4% #122 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1999 2–3 40.0% #351 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2000 0–1 0.0% #702 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2001 1–1 50.0% #415 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Tebbutt Oscar Burrieza
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1995 12 10 22 54.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1996 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 49 90 45.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 4 11 15 26.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 1 8 9 11.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Tebbutt Oscar Burrieza
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1486 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.26
22 1993 1528 116.9 +1.36 -0.40 0.879 47.7% +17 — — 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.8 -0.46 1998 1437 109.5 — — — — +43 — — 18.2% -1.82 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.10
23 1994 1569 126.2 +2.03 -1.09 1.056 51.0% -7 — +35 50.9% +0.23 2–6 (25%) 4–7 (36%) 93.7 +0.51 1999 1461 101.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.14
24 1995 1678 130.4 +0.67 -3.08 0.895 48.5% +38 -149 -145 44.3% -0.35 11–5 (69%) 12–15 (44%) 105.0 -1.13 2000 1444 107.1 — — — — — — +108 40.0% -0.30 0–2 1–1 — -0.30
25 1996 1624 132.5 +0.86 -1.09 0.990 50.3% +71 -81 — 47.5% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.2 -0.08 2001 1411 96.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.04
26 1997 1613 131.8 +2.38 -1.49 1.017 50.3% +42 — — 44.9% -0.04 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 93.1 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1585 113.1 -1.87 -1.62 0.894 48.4% +58 -47 -88 43.5% -0.33 5–6 (45%) 2–7 (22%) 94.5 +1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1586 115.1 -1.44 -0.68 0.908 48.6% +45 — — 40.0% -0.53 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1550 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1550 102.5 -0.09 -1.50 1.151 52.5% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1401 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1397 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1384 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1737 132.1 +0.66 -1.69 0.954 49.5% +41 -100 -56 45.5% -0.18 27–36 (43%) 34–49 (41%) 93.3 +0.54 — 1500 105.3 — — — — +43 — +108 25.6% -1.40 1–5 (17%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 -3.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.