H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michel Kratochvil vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-2
Hicham Arazi holds a 2–0 lead over Michel Kratochvil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2002 Adelaide third round 6-3 2-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2002* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-3 2-6 7-6(3) | Michel Kratochvil | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2000* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hicham Arazi | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Michel Kratochvil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michel Kratochvil | #868 | #35 | 990 | 1,761 | 70 | 89 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michel Kratochvil | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #93 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #69 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #131 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #167 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |