H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michel Kratochvil vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 1-0
Michel Kratochvil holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michel Kratochvil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michel Kratochvil won the 2001 Nottingham fourth round 6-0 4-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2001* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Michel Kratochvil | 6-0 4-2 (ret.) | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michel Kratochvil | #868 | #35 | 990 | 1,761 | 70 | 89 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michel Kratochvil | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #93 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #69 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #131 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #167 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |