H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michel Kratochvil vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 2-1
Michel Kratochvil holds a 2–1 lead over Max Mirnyi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Michel Kratochvil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2004 Canada Masters second round 7-6(6) 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2004* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 7-6(6) 7-6(9) | Michel Kratochvil | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Michel Kratochvil | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Michel Kratochvil | 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michel Kratochvil | #868 | #35 | 990 | 1,761 | 70 | 89 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michel Kratochvil | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #93 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #69 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #131 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #167 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |