H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs C. Steeb H2H: 1-0
Michiel Schapers holds a 1–0 lead over C. Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1988 Metz semifinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1988* | Metz | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Michiel Schapers | 6-4 6-4 | C. Steeb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| C. Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | C. Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |