H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs Chris Pridham H2H: 1-0
Michiel Schapers holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Pridham in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1992 Roland Garros second round 7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Michiel Schapers | 7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Chris Pridham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Pridham | #1,219 | #75 | 433 | 1,649 | 51 | 74 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | Chris Pridham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #155 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #131 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #145 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |