H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-2
Damir Keretic holds a 2–1 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Damir Keretic leads 2–0 on clay, while Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1987 Tokyo Outdoor second round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1987* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Michiel Schapers | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1986* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-2 6-4 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1984* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 5-7 6-4 3-6 3-0 (ret.) | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |