H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Michiel Schapers vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Michiel Schapers holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1991 Libéma Open quarterfinal 7-6(3) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michiel Schapers
NED Age 66 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michiel Schapers #232 7-6(3) 7-5 Diego Nargiso #136 Match data Jun 15, 1991* QF Libéma Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michiel Schapers #1,230 #25 606 1,831 154 177 46.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michiel Schapers Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1983 9–14 39.1% #95 1,580 0 0 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1984 10–11 47.6% #78 1,645 0 0 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1985 12–19 38.7% #105 1,645 0 0 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 1986 20–23 46.5% #84 1,633 0 0 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1987 26–20 56.5% #49 1,695 0 0 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1988 27–20 57.4% #50 1,744 0 0 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1989 19–18 51.4% #79 1,663 0 0 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 1990 5–13 27.8% #169 1,560 0 0 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 1991 6–5 54.5% #85 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1992 17–26 39.5% #103 1,590 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1993 3–8 27.3% #270 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michiel Schapers Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 1986 10 8 18 55.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1988 12 9 21 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1989 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1990 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 1991 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 76 146 47.9% 21 38 59 35.6% 33 26 59 55.9% 30 37 67 44.8% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michiel Schapers Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) 106.6 +0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.5 -1.78
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) 95.1 -0.69
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 94.6 +2.22
23 1983 1580 129.8 — — — — +38 -66 — 39.6% -0.91 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 -0.88 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 94.7 -0.26
24 1984 1646 127.3 — — — — +15 -79 — 51.0% -0.22 3–3 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.9 +0.24 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
25 1985 1645 123.8 — — — — -73 -92 +10 41.0% -0.63 7–8 (47%) 3–6 (33%) 98.6 +1.43 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 +0.11
26 1986 1633 130.3 — — — — +5 -85 +8 50.0% -0.09 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 101.6 +0.67 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.08
27 1987 1696 132.9 — — — — -37 -134 +69 55.1% +0.19 8–8 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 102.2 +1.92 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 1988 1744 141.0 — — — — +29 -190 +13 52.6% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–8 (53%) 103.0 +0.01 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 1989 1664 124.8 — — — — -15 — +111 50.0% -0.12 4–6 (40%) 12–7 (63%) 99.9 +1.42 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 1990 1560 121.4 — — — — +60 -34 +149 32.6% -0.76 2–4 (33%) 4–7 (36%) 97.5 -0.19 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.9 +0.50
31 1991 1613 110.9 +2.32 -0.83 1.049 50.9% -25 — +138 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1591 128.8 +0.74 -3.05 0.905 48.3% -6 -24 +101 40.4% -0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–10 (33%) 99.3 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1527 109.4 -1.77 -2.10 0.883 48.0% +9 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 95.6 +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1832 134.9 +0.62 -2.52 0.924 48.7% +1 -90 +67 47.0% -0.24 51–58 (47%) 58–65 (47%) 100.1 +1.76 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.