H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs Diego Perez H2H: 0-1
Diego Perez holds a 1–0 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Perez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1986 Toulouse quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1986* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Diego Perez | 6-4 6-4 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |