H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs Jose Luis Clerc H2H: 0-1
Jose Luis Clerc holds a 1–0 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Luis Clerc leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Luis Clerc won the 1983 Rome fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 67
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1983* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jose Luis Clerc | 6-2 6-1 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jose Luis Clerc | #1,263 | #4 | 20 | 2,217 | 361 | 141 | 71.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 26 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | Jose Luis Clerc | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #15 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 68–22 | 75.6% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 11 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #5 | 2,061 | 0 | 17 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 66–23 | 74.2% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #8 | 1,894 | 0 | 26 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,824 | 0 | 26 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #28 | 1,811 | 0 | 26 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #514 | 1,722 | 0 | 26 |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |