H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs Leif Shiras H2H: 1-1
Michiel Schapers and Leif Shiras are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1985 Melbourne third round 4-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1985* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Michiel Schapers | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Leif Shiras | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Leif Shiras | 6-2 6-7 7-6 7-6 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leif Shiras | #1,118 | #31 | 291 | 1,687 | 71 | 102 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | Leif Shiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #123 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |