H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michiel Schapers vs Mark Dickson H2H: 1-1

Michiel Schapers and Mark Dickson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1988 Bristol round of 16 7-6 6-4.

NED Age 66 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Dickson #171 7-6 6-4 Michiel Schapers #39 Match data Jun 17, 1988* R16 Bristol ATP 250 Grass
Michiel Schapers #66 6-3 6-7 9-7 Mark Dickson #83 Match data Mar 15, 1986* QF Metz ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michiel Schapers #1,230 #25 606 1,831 154 177 46.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,818 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michiel Schapers Mark Dickson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1981 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
22 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,688 0 0
23 1983 9–14 39.1% #95 1,580 0 0 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
24 1984 10–11 47.6% #78 1,645 0 0 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,812 0 2
25 1985 12–19 38.7% #105 1,645 0 0 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
26 1986 20–23 46.5% #84 1,633 0 0 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
27 1987 26–20 56.5% #49 1,695 0 0 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,619 0 2
28 1988 27–20 57.4% #50 1,744 0 0 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2
29 1989 19–18 51.4% #79 1,663 0 0
30 1990 5–13 27.8% #169 1,560 0 0
31 1991 6–5 54.5% #85 1,613 0 0
32 1992 17–26 39.5% #103 1,590 0 0
33 1993 3–8 27.3% #270 1,527 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michiel Schapers Mark Dickson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 11 12 23 47.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
25 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1986 10 8 18 55.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1988 12 9 21 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
29 1989 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1990 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1992 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
33 1993 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 70 76 146 47.9% 21 38 59 35.6% 33 26 59 55.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 43 41 84 51.2% 43 39 82 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 31 30 61 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michiel Schapers Mark Dickson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1981 1501 116.6 +36 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–1 -0.12
22 1982 1689 143.1 +21 -140 50.8% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) +0.03
23 1983 1580 129.8 +38 -66 39.6% -0.91 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) -0.88 1983 1699 149.0 +76 -61 -176 51.8% +0.23 6–9 (40%) 12–13 (48%) -1.74
24 1984 1646 127.3 +15 -79 51.0% -0.22 3–3 (50%) 5–3 (63%) +0.24 1984 1812 143.4 +12 -64 58.3% +0.53 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) +2.51
25 1985 1645 123.8 -73 -92 +10 41.0% -0.63 7–8 (47%) 3–6 (33%) +1.43 1985 1718 135.5 -39 -4 -56 51.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) -0.14
26 1986 1633 130.3 +5 -85 +8 50.0% -0.09 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) +0.67 1986 1614 109.2 -4 +68 48.9% -0.47 2–7 (22%) 5–1 (83%) +2.89
27 1987 1696 132.9 -37 -134 +69 55.1% +0.19 8–8 (50%) 10–8 (56%) +1.92 1987 1619 119.2 +3 +34 49.0% -0.06 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) +0.68
28 1988 1744 141.0 +29 -190 +13 52.6% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–8 (53%) +0.01 1988 1625 120.2 -46 +29 +71 52.4% +0.10 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) -0.23
29 1989 1664 124.8 -15 +111 50.0% -0.12 4–6 (40%) 12–7 (63%) +1.42
30 1990 1560 121.4 +60 -34 +149 32.6% -0.76 2–4 (33%) 4–7 (36%) -0.19
31 1991 1613 110.9 +2.32 -0.83 1.049 50.9% -25 +138 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) +0.41
32 1992 1591 128.8 +0.74 -3.05 0.905 48.3% -6 -24 +101 40.4% -0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–10 (33%) -0.18
33 1993 1527 109.4 -1.77 -2.10 0.883 48.0% +9 33.3% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 2–5 (29%) +0.95
Career 1832 134.9 +0.62 -2.52 0.924 48.7% +1 -90 +67 47.0% -0.24 51–58 (47%) 58–65 (47%) 100.1 +1.76 1819 142.5 +11 -32 -54 52.5% +0.17 40–52 (43%) 47–46 (51%) 97.9 +1.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.