H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-3
Mark Woodforde holds a 3–1 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1992 Singapore fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1992* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-1 6-2 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1989* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 7-6 6-2 6-3 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1987* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Michiel Schapers | 6-3 1-6 8-6 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1986* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-4 4-2 (ret.) | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |