H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michiel Schapers vs Marko Ostoja H2H: 2-0
Michiel Schapers holds a 2–0 lead over Marko Ostoja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michiel Schapers leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1989 Rotterdam third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1989* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michiel Schapers | 6-3 6-2 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1986* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Michiel Schapers | 6-3 6-2 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michiel Schapers | Marko Ostoja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |