H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mikael Pernfors vs Diego Perez H2H: 1-0
Mikael Pernfors holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikael Pernfors leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikael Pernfors won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 3-6 6-2 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Mikael Pernfors | 3-6 6-2 6-3 6-0 | Diego Perez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Pernfors | #1,299 | #10 | 1,033 | 1,920 | 138 | 111 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Pernfors | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #19 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #240 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1269 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |