H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mikael Pernfors vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 1-1
Mikael Pernfors and Leonardo Lavalle are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mikael Pernfors leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikael Pernfors won the 1989 Key Biscayne third round 1-6 6-2 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1989* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mikael Pernfors | 1-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1986* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Leonardo Lavalle | 6-2 6-1 | Mikael Pernfors | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Pernfors | #1,299 | #10 | 1,033 | 1,920 | 138 | 111 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Pernfors | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #19 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #240 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1269 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |