H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mikael Pernfors vs Libor Pimek H2H: 1-1
Mikael Pernfors and Libor Pimek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mikael Pernfors leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikael Pernfors won the 1987 Rome second round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1987* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mikael Pernfors | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1987* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Libor Pimek | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Mikael Pernfors | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Pernfors | #1,299 | #10 | 1,033 | 1,920 | 138 | 111 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Pernfors | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #19 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #175 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #240 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1269 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |