H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Mikael Tillstrom vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 3-1
Mikael Tillstrom holds a 3–1 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mikael Tillstrom leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 2000 Doha fourth round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2000* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mikael Tillstrom | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1999* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mikael Tillstrom | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1997* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mikael Tillstrom | 6-2 6-4 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Sep 16, 1993* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-3 6-0 | Mikael Tillstrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,831 | 107 | 108 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Tillstrom | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #80 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |