H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Mikael Tillstrom vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-0
Mikael Tillstrom holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikael Tillstrom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 1994 Roland Garros second round 6-3 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mikael Tillstrom | 6-3 7-6(2) 6-4 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,831 | 107 | 108 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Tillstrom | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #80 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |