H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mikael Tillstrom vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-0
Mikael Tillstrom holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikael Tillstrom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 1996 Roland Garros second round 5-7 6-3 1-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mikael Tillstrom | 5-7 6-3 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,831 | 107 | 108 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Tillstrom | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #80 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |