H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mikael Tillstrom vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-1
Mikael Tillstrom and Sargis Sargsian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mikael Tillstrom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 2000 San Jose fourth round 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2000* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mikael Tillstrom | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1998* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sargis Sargsian | 6-3 6-3 | Mikael Tillstrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,831 | 107 | 108 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikael Tillstrom | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #80 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |