H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mike Bauer vs Hank Pfister H2H: 1-1
Mike Bauer and Hank Pfister are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike Bauer leads 1–0 on grass, while Hank Pfister leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1984 Columbus third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1984* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hank Pfister | 6-4 6-4 | Mike Bauer | Match data |
| Dec 23, 1982* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mike Bauer | 7-5 6-2 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Bauer | #773 | #29 | 66 | 1,785 | 75 | 91 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Bauer | Hank Pfister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #667 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #88 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #185 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #226 | 1,517 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,516 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #430 | 1,494 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #787 | 1,486 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |