H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Mike Bauer vs Tom Cain H2H: 1-1

Mike Bauer and Tom Cain are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike Bauer leads 1–0 on grass, while Tom Cain leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mike Bauer won the 1984 Australian Open round of 64 6-2 4-6 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mike Bauer
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tom Cain
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mike Bauer #30 6-2 4-6 7-6 7-5 Tom Cain #234 Match data Nov 30, 1984* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Tom Cain 6-4 7-5 6-3 Mike Bauer #42 Match data Sep 1, 1983* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mike Bauer #773 #29 66 1,786 75 91 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tom Cain #693 #70 0 1,650 43 67 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mike Bauer Tom Cain
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1980 4–9 30.8% #219 1,512 0 0
22 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,494 0 0 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,476 0 0
23 1982 15–9 62.5% #88 1,684 0 2 1982 13–14 48.1% — 1,551 0 0
24 1983 28–23 54.9% #44 1,779 0 3 1983 15–19 44.1% #95 1,614 0 0
25 1984 17–19 47.2% #46 1,674 0 3 1984 6–9 40.0% #182 1,603 0 0
26 1985 9–22 29.0% #185 1,545 0 3 1985 3–10 23.1% #213 1,552 0 0
27 1986 2–5 28.6% #226 1,518 0 3 1986 0–1 0.0% #597 1,537 0 0
28 1987 1–3 25.0% #202 1,517 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1988 1–4 20.0% #430 1,494 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1995 0–1 0.0% #787 1,486 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mike Bauer Tom Cain
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
24 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1983 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1985 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1986 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 38 57 33.3% 2 13 15 13.3% 30 23 53 56.6% 24 17 41 58.5% — 18 24 42 42.9% 12 17 29 41.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 8 17 25 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mike Bauer Tom Cain
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1512 120.9 — — — — +61 -15 — 32.3% -1.03 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.32
22 1981 1495 113.4 — — — — +27 +41 — 33.3% -0.73 0–1 — — +0.46 1981 1477 98.9 — — — — +51 +20 — 40.0% -1.07 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.35
23 1982 1685 120.3 — — — — -54 -193 0 58.3% +0.53 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +3.18 1982 1552 124.8 — — — — +21 +2 -40 46.8% -0.03 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.94
24 1983 1780 137.3 — — — — -138 — +83 55.8% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 12–15 (44%) — +1.47 1983 1615 130.4 — — — — +13 -24 -86 47.0% -0.12 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.53
25 1984 1674 119.7 — — — — +36 -224 +65 45.8% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.72 1984 1604 115.1 — — — — -3 — -44 44.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.40
26 1985 1545 125.2 — — — — +96 — +68 36.3% -0.90 1–8 (11%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.22 1985 1552 117.6 — — — — +5 — — 31.3% -1.09 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.01
27 1986 1518 104.0 — — — — +57 — — 36.4% -0.86 1–2 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.77 1986 1538 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05
28 1987 1517 106.3 — — — — — — +64 33.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1495 108.9 — — — — — — +82 33.3% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1995 1487 104.5 +0.57 -0.71 0.924 48.1% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1787 129.4 +0.57 -0.71 0.924 48.1% -19 -109 +64 47.0% -0.21 20–32 (38%) 35–32 (52%) 95.2 +4.66 — 1650 126.9 — — — — +20 -8 -54 42.1% -0.42 18–17 (51%) 14–21 (40%) 97.9 +4.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.