H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mike Cahill vs Bruce Manson H2H: 0-2
Bruce Manson holds a 2–0 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bruce Manson leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bruce Manson won the 1982 Mexico City Wct fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1982* | Mexico City Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Bruce Manson | 6-3 6-4 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1979* | Tulsa | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bruce Manson | 7-6 6-1 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bruce Manson | #597 | #39 | 0 | 1,838 | 129 | 171 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Bruce Manson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #187 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #215 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #105 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #83 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #135 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |