H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mike Cahill vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 0-3
Buster C Mottram holds a 3–0 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Buster C Mottram leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Buster C Mottram won the 1979 Tokyo Outdoor fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1979* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 6-2 6-1 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1978* | Osaka | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 6-4 6-3 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1976* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 6-1 6-2 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mike Cahill | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |