H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Mike Cahill vs Jeff Austin H2H: 0-1

Jeff Austin holds a 1–0 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Austin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jeff Austin won the 1975 Birmingham round of 32 6-2 6-4.

USA Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 75 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Austin 6-2 6-4 Mike Cahill #139 Match data Jan 23, 1975* R32 Birmingham ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mike Cahill #448 #58 0 1,727 100 156 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jeff Austin 1,633 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mike Cahill Jeff Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1974 4–4 50.0% #138 1,539 0 0
23 1975 10–17 37.0% #79 1,585 0 0
24 1976 13–27 32.5% #136 1,587 0 0
25 1977 10–18 35.7% #94 1,574 0 0
26 1978 17–20 45.9% #69 1,692 0 0
27 1979 18–25 41.9% #113 1,678 0 0
28 1980 10–19 34.5% #189 1,601 0 0
29 1981 6–10 37.5% #100 1,629 0 0
30 1982 12–14 46.2% #98 1,644 0 0
31 1983 0–2 0.0% #108 1,621 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mike Cahill Jeff Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1970 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1971 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 8 12 33.3%
23 1975 3 4 7 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
24 1976 1 4 5 20.0% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1977 2 3 5 40.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 9 15 40.0%
27 1979 9 9 18 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
28 1980 4 4 8 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
29 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1983 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 33 40 73 45.2% 49 66 115 42.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 18 44 62 29.0% 14 23 37 37.8% 7 12 19 36.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 13 25 38 34.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mike Cahill Jeff Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1970 1489 99.7 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.08
19 1971 1482 104.7 +13 +58 42.9% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 +0.36
20 1972 1438 109.6 +23 +111 39.3% -0.54 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 +0.76
21 1973 1597 119.8 +28 -92 52.0% +0.28 4–4 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 100.3 +0.84
22 1974 1540 112.1 +29 50.0% -0.44 1–1 3–0 (100%) +0.47 1974 1557 115.8 -16 -42 37.5% -0.72 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +1.53
23 1975 1586 128.8 0 -9 42.9% -0.51 2–9 (18%) 3–2 (60%) 96.8 +0.58 1975 1551 123.3 +5 +2 41.7% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–8 (27%) 99.3 +2.29
24 1976 1587 130.4 -15 -18 36.8% -0.84 4–7 (36%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 -1.12 1976 1526 110.2 -31 26.1% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.18
25 1977 1574 122.9 +16 -15 40.3% -0.63 4–7 (36%) 6–4 (60%) 102.2 +1.24 1977 1502 103.6 -42 0.0% -3.38 0–1 -0.24
26 1978 1692 139.6 -36 -53 45.8% +0.05 5–4 (56%) 2–8 (20%) 98.4 +0.86
27 1979 1679 129.0 -28 +8 -236 42.7% -0.57 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.42
28 1980 1602 134.8 +14 +31 35.5% -0.68 1–4 (20%) 2–7 (22%) 93.1 -0.50
29 1981 1630 125.6 +36 44.7% -0.55 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.59
30 1982 1644 127.1 -2 +3 46.6% -0.35 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.34
31 1983 1621 97.8 0.0% -2.75 -0.27
Career 1728 136.1 -7 -5 -236 41.6% -0.53 29–45 (39%) 35–34 (51%) 100.1 +1.42 1633 120.1 -1 +53 -73 39.9% -0.63 15–25 (38%) 17–26 (40%) 93.1 +5.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.