H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mike Cahill vs Jim Delaney H2H: 2-0
Mike Cahill holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Delaney in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike Cahill leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mike Cahill won the 1977 Hong Kong fourth round 4-6 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1977* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mike Cahill | 4-6 7-6 6-1 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1976* | Salisbury | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mike Cahill | 6-3 6-4 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jim Delaney | #262 | #59 | 0 | 1,676 | 78 | 131 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Jim Delaney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #159 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #64 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #133 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #276 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #269 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #269 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #143 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |