Mike Cahill
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 13, 1981 | H2H |
| Tom Gorman | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 16, 1980 | H2H |
| Eliot Teltscher | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 24, 1982 | H2H |
| Roscoe Tanner | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 10, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 5, 1981 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Mike Cahill and Ricardo Cano are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1976 Roland Garros round of 128 5-7 6-3 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Cano | 5-7 6-3 6-1 6-1 | Mike Cahill | Match data | Jun 2, 1976* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Mike Cahill | 6-2 6-3 | Ricardo Cano | Match data | May 8, 1976* | R16 | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 156 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #42 | 0 | 1,797 | 140 | 145 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #136 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #94 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #169 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1976 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 38 | 23 | 61 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 1978 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1977 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 16 | 20 | 36 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 1979 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1981 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 29 | 22 | 51 | 56.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 40 | 73 | 45.2% | 49 | 66 | 115 | 42.6% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 18 | 44 | 62 | 29.0% | — | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 128 | 129 | 257 | 49.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1494 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.67 | — | — | — | -0.19 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1490 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1477 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 30.0% | -1.45 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.44 |
| 22 | 1974 | 1540 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 50.0% | -0.44 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.47 | 1973 | 1490 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 |
| 23 | 1975 | 1586 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -9 | — | 42.9% | -0.51 | 2–9 (18%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.58 | 1974 | 1504 | 106.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.69 |
| 24 | 1976 | 1587 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -18 | — | 36.8% | -0.84 | 4–7 (36%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -1.12 | 1975 | 1739 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | 51.9% | +0.06 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.44 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1574 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -15 | — | 40.3% | -0.63 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +1.24 | 1976 | 1732 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -109 | +26 | — | 56.2% | +0.47 | 14–8 (64%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +6.25 |
| 26 | 1978 | 1692 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -53 | — | 45.8% | +0.05 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–8 (20%) | — | +0.86 | 1977 | 1674 | 138.6 | — | — | — | — | -85 | +10 | — | 43.4% | -0.47 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -1.77 |
| 27 | 1979 | 1679 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +8 | -236 | 42.7% | -0.57 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +0.42 | 1978 | 1632 | 125.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | 44.6% | -0.20 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +1.33 |
| 28 | 1980 | 1602 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +31 | — | 35.5% | -0.68 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–7 (22%) | — | -0.50 | 1979 | 1567 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | — | -5 | — | 36.1% | -0.89 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.24 |
| 29 | 1981 | 1630 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 44.7% | -0.55 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.59 | 1980 | 1543 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | 37.0% | -0.63 | 1–4 (20%) | — | — | +0.12 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1644 | 127.1 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +3 | — | 46.6% | -0.35 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +1.34 | 1981 | 1717 | 140.9 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +17 | — | 54.5% | +0.30 | 11–4 (73%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | +1.92 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1621 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | -0.27 | 1982 | 1608 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +43 | — | 26.5% | -1.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.08 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1581 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | 46.4% | -0.50 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.87 |
| Career | — | 1728 | 136.1 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -5 | -236 | 41.6% | -0.53 | 29–45 (39%) | 35–34 (51%) | 100.1 | +1.42 | — | 1797 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +21 | — | 47.7% | -0.16 | 51–43 (54%) | 33–30 (52%) | 106.0 | +3.30 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 13, 1981 | H2H |
| Tom Gorman | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 16, 1980 | H2H |
| Eliot Teltscher | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 24, 1982 | H2H |
| Roscoe Tanner | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 10, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 5, 1981 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Vilas | 0 | 9 | 9 | Nov 19, 1981 | H2H |
| Wojtek Fibak | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 22, 1983 | H2H |
| Paolo Bertolucci | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 21, 1980 | H2H |
| Ivan Molina | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 8, 1979 | H2H |
| Zeljko Franulovic | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jul 20, 1983 | H2H |