H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mike Cahill vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 1-1
Mike Cahill and Ricardo Cano are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1976 Roland Garros first round 5-7 6-3 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1976* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | 5-7 6-3 6-1 6-1 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| May 8, 1976* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mike Cahill | 6-2 6-3 | Ricardo Cano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |