H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mike Cahill vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 0-5
Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–0 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1982 Memphis second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
5
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1982* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Roscoe Tanner | 6-4 7-5 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1978* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-2 6-4 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1975* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Jul 23, 1975* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Roscoe Tanner | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1974* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 7-5 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |