Mike Cahill
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 13, 1981 | H2H |
| Tom Gorman | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 16, 1980 | H2H |
| Eliot Teltscher | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 24, 1982 | H2H |
| Roscoe Tanner | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 10, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 5, 1981 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Tom Gorman holds a 4–2 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tom Gorman leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mike Cahill won the 1980 Los Angeles Open round of 64 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | 7-5 6-3 | Tom Gorman | Match data | Apr 16, 1980* | R64 | Los Angeles Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Tom Gorman | 6-2 6-4 | Mike Cahill | Match data | Feb 14, 1979* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Tom Gorman | 6-4 6-4 | Mike Cahill | Match data | Nov 18, 1978* | SF | Taipei | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Mike Cahill | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Tom Gorman | Match data | Nov 16, 1978* | R32 | Hong Kong Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Tom Gorman | 6-2 6-7 6-2 | Mike Cahill | Match data | Jan 25, 1978* | R32 | Baltimore | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Tom Gorman | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Mike Cahill | Match data | Oct 30, 1975* | R16 | Perth | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 156 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tom Gorman | #826 | #10 | 0 | 2,006 | 415 | 291 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Tom Gorman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #136 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 49–31 | 61.2% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #94 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 44–27 | 62.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 44–28 | 61.1% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 52–28 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #21 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #46 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,773 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #156 | 1,618 | 0 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Tom Gorman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1968 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1969 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1976 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1970 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 25 | 1977 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1971 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 1978 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1972 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% |
| 27 | 1979 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1973 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% |
| 28 | 1980 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1974 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% |
| 29 | 1981 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1975 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% |
| 30 | 1982 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1976 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% |
| 31 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 33 | 40 | 73 | 45.2% | 49 | 66 | 115 | 42.6% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 18 | 44 | 62 | 29.0% | — | 149 | 96 | 245 | 60.8% | 68 | 60 | 128 | 53.1% | 93 | 60 | 153 | 60.8% | 105 | 75 | 180 | 58.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mike Cahill | Tom Gorman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 22 | 1974 | 1540 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 50.0% | -0.44 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.47 | 1968 | 1598 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -54 | -40 | 59.7% | +0.34 | 3–2 (60%) | — | — | +0.03 |
| 23 | 1975 | 1586 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -9 | — | 42.9% | -0.51 | 2–9 (18%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.58 | 1969 | 1613 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -82 | +81 | 50.5% | +0.18 | 7–5 (58%) | — | — | +0.76 |
| 24 | 1976 | 1587 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -18 | — | 36.8% | -0.84 | 4–7 (36%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -1.12 | 1970 | 1793 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -282 | +24 | 56.5% | +0.33 | 15–9 (63%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | +3.37 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1574 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -15 | — | 40.3% | -0.63 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +1.24 | 1971 | 1829 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -188 | +105 | 59.9% | +0.48 | 14–10 (58%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | -0.31 |
| 26 | 1978 | 1692 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -53 | — | 45.8% | +0.05 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–8 (20%) | — | +0.86 | 1972 | 1958 | 142.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -325 | +22 | 57.0% | +0.35 | 19–10 (66%) | 10–13 (43%) | — | -1.48 |
| 27 | 1979 | 1679 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +8 | -236 | 42.7% | -0.57 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +0.42 | 1973 | 1945 | 143.6 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -130 | +3 | 58.7% | +0.42 | 26–11 (70%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -3.17 |
| 28 | 1980 | 1602 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +31 | — | 35.5% | -0.68 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–7 (22%) | — | -0.50 | 1974 | 1837 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +106 | -86 | +95 | 63.4% | +0.83 | 18–10 (64%) | 16–15 (52%) | — | +2.50 |
| 29 | 1981 | 1630 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 44.7% | -0.55 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.59 | 1975 | 1871 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +69 | -167 | +21 | 50.4% | +0.04 | 12–9 (57%) | 13–9 (59%) | — | +0.06 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1644 | 127.1 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +3 | — | 46.6% | -0.35 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +1.34 | 1976 | 1766 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | +127 | -86 | +99 | 53.3% | -0.03 | 12–8 (60%) | 14–6 (70%) | — | -1.43 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1621 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | -0.27 | 1977 | 1773 | 144.6 | — | — | — | — | +90 | — | +21 | 52.5% | +0.13 | 9–6 (60%) | 9–11 (45%) | — | -1.59 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1776 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -129 | +92 | 54.5% | +0.26 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +2.15 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1739 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | +61 | 53.7% | +0.19 | 10–6 (63%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | +4.23 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1618 | 116.9 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | +100 | 37.2% | -0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +0.80 |
| Career | — | 1728 | 136.1 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -5 | -236 | 41.6% | -0.53 | 29–45 (39%) | 35–34 (51%) | 100.1 | +1.42 | — | 2006 | 140.1 | — | — | — | — | +55 | -161 | +51 | 56.0% | +0.30 | 153–93 (62%) | 106–100 (51%) | 103.9 | +0.85 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 13, 1981 | H2H |
| Tom Gorman | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 16, 1980 | H2H |
| Eliot Teltscher | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 24, 1982 | H2H |
| Roscoe Tanner | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 10, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 5, 1981 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilie Nastase | 4 | 16 | 20 | Jan 27, 1978 | H2H |
| Stan Smith | 2 | 17 | 19 | Mar 30, 1977 | H2H |
| Harold Solomon | 4 | 8 | 12 | Feb 28, 1980 | H2H |
| Roscoe Tanner | 5 | 7 | 12 | Dec 16, 1977 | H2H |
| Jaime Fillol | 8 | 4 | 12 | Mar 21, 1976 | H2H |