H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Mike Estep vs Butch Seewagen H2H: 0-1
Butch Seewagen holds a 1–0 lead over Mike Estep in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Butch Seewagen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Butch Seewagen won the 1968 Milwaukee second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1968* | Milwaukee | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Butch Seewagen | 6-1 6-3 | Mike Estep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Estep | #409 | #59 | 0 | 1,760 | 120 | 184 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Butch Seewagen | #826 | #87 | 0 | 1,679 | 67 | 83 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Estep | Butch Seewagen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #81 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #212 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #200 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1982 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #93 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #227 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |